[关键词]
[摘要]
目的：比较Titmus立体视检查图、颜氏随机点立体视检查图和金氏随机点立体视检查图三种立体视检查法进行儿童立体视检查的差异。
方法：在相同检测条件下，对81例5～7岁正常视觉发育的儿童分别运用金氏随机点立体视检查图、颜氏立体图、Titmus立体视检查图检查近立体视锐度，并对结果进行统计学分析。
结果：经统计分析，颜氏随机点立体视检查图与Titmus立体视检查图两种方法检测结果一致性较好，正常立体视与异常立体视结果差异无显著性(χ2=0.2282，P=0.6329)； 金氏立体图检查法与其余两种方法检查结果差异较大，差异有显著性(χ2=58.1692，P<0.01)。
结论：颜氏随机点立体图与Titmus立体视检查结果相近，金氏立体图检查结果差异较大。在临床应用中应尽量使用多种方法评价立体视，使检测结果更准确。
[Key word]
[Abstract]
AIM: To compare the differences of Titmus stereopsis test, random dot by Yan Shaoming and another random-dot which by Jin Guichang on stereopsis inspection in children.
METHODS: Near binocular stereoacuity of 81 cases(5-7 years)was examined with three kinds of methods under the same test conditions. The results were analyzed statistically.
RESULTS: The results of Yan stereo and Titmus stereopsis had no significant difference(χ2=0.2282, P=0.6329). There were significant differences on both normal stereopsis and abnormal stereopsis results by Jin stereo and the other two methods(χ2=58.1692, P< 0.01).
CONCLUSION: The results of Yan's random dot stereogram and Titmus stereopsis test are similar, while large difference is in the Jin stereopsis inspection. In clinical application, Different methods should be used to evaluate stereoscopic vision.
[中图分类号]
[基金项目]
