方法：选取11例22眼近视和近视散光患者为全飞秒组(SMILE组)，同期23例43眼飞秒激光制瓣LASIK的近视和近视散光患者为飞秒激光制瓣的LASIK组(LASIK组)。使用双通道系统(OQAS)检查、记录两组患者术前及术后1mo内的结果，对比二者的调制传递函数截止空间频率(modulation transfer function cutoff frequency，MTF cutoff)、斯特列尔比(strehl ratio，SR)和眼内客观散射指数(objective scattering index，OSI)，分析并评价两种手术方式术后早期的视觉质量。

结果：SMILE组和LASIK组术后1mo时的MTF cutoff分别为34.835±10.113c/deg和38.362±10.623c/deg(t=0.925，P=0.362)； SR分别为0.204±0.077和0.218±0.072(t=0.557，P=0.582)； OSI分别为0.608±0.291和0.545±0.405(t=-0.473，P=0.640)。

结论：双通道客观视觉质量分析显示SMILE和飞秒激光LASIK两种术式对视觉质量的影响无明显差异。

METHODS: This study comprised 22 eyes(11 patients)underwent SMILE and 43 eyes(23 patients)received LASIK with femtosecond laser to correct myopia and myopic astigmatism. The two groups were recorded bydouble-pass optical quality analysis system(OQAS)at preoperative and postoperative 1mo. The two groups were compared: modulation transfer function cutoff frequency(MTF cutoff), strehl ratio(SR), objective scattering index(OSI). The early visual quality after operation between two groups were analyzed and evaluated.

RESULTS: The MTF cutoff after operation one month were 34.835±10.113c/deg(SMILE group)and 38.362±10.623c/deg(LASIK group)(t=0.925, P=0.362). The SR after operation one month were 0.204±0.077(SMILE group)and 0.218±0.072(LASIK group)(t=0.557, P=0.582). The OSI after operation one month were 0.608±0.291(SMILE group)and 0.545±0.405(LASIK group)(t=-0.473, P=0.640).

CONCLUSION: The double-pass OQAS tell us that there was not statistically significant between femtosecond laser SMILE and femtosecond LASIK in the treatment of myopia.