方法：选取我院2012-01/2015-01干眼症患者106例进行试验观察，并按照数字表法将患者分为观察组与对照组，每组53例，对照组使用常规治疗方法加上单玻璃酸钠滴眼液治疗，观察组在常规治疗方法的基础上联合应用普拉洛芬滴眼液和玻璃酸钠滴眼液治疗，比较两组患者的临床治疗效果、治疗前后的干眼症评分与荧光素染色的评分、泪液分泌试验以及观察患者的泪膜破裂时间。

结果：观察组与对照组患者的治疗有效率分别为94.3%(50/53)、84.9%(45/53)； 观察组治疗前后的干眼症评分为3.24±0.52、0.32±0.06分，对照组治疗前后的干眼症评分为3.26±0.48、0.75±0.24分； 观察组治疗前后的泪膜破裂时间为5.67±3.052、12.95±2.865s，对照组治疗前后的泪膜破裂时间为6.23±2.985、9.85±2.714s，两组患者在各方面的差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论：联合应用普拉洛芬和玻璃酸钠在治疗干眼症方面具有较高的临床疗效，具有较高的安全性和保水性，改善患者的干眼症状，提高患者的生活质量。

METHODS: From January 2012 to January 2015 inour hospital, 106 patients with dry eye were tested and observed. In accordance with the number table, patients were divided into observation group and control group, 53 patients in the control group using conventional treatment plus single sodium hyaluronate eye drops, observation group using pranoprofen combined sodium hyaluronate eye drops, besides conventional treatment. Clinical outcomes between the two groups before and after treatments, dry eye score, fluorescein staining score, Schirmer I test and tear film break up time(BUT)were observed and analyzed.

RESULTS:The effective rates of the two groups were 94.3%(50/53)and 84.9%(45/53). Dry eye score of observation group before and after treatment were 3.24±0.52 and 0.32±0.06points, those of the control group were 3.26±0.48 and 0.75±0.24points. BUT of the experimental group before and after treatments were 5.67±3.052 and 12.95±2.865s, those of the control group were 6.23±2.985 and 9.85±2.714s.The differences between the two groups on the indicators above were statistically significant(P<0.05).

CONCLUSION: The combination of pranoprofen and sodium hyaluronate for the treatment of dry eye is effective, with high security and water holding capacity, which can improve the symptoms of dry eye and the patients' life quality.