方法：选取巴什肯特大学医学专业学生52例，其中男性33例(63.46%)，女性19例(36.54%)，平均年龄21.18±2.52岁。参与学生视力正常(20/20)，且经Ishihara假同色测试法显示无先天性色觉缺陷。运用Gundogan方法确定主视眼(DE)。通过法-孟二氏100色度试验(FM100HT)检验色觉辨别能力，包括左右眼及双眼(TE)的总误差分(TES)、部分误差分(LES)。误差分分为三组：双眼、DE及非主视眼(NDE)。应用TNO检查双眼视觉与立体感，并根据480-15 arc/s范围的立体感水平分为四组。

结果：FM100HT的误差分显示无性别差异的TES，蓝黄LES和红绿LES分别为61.22±30.32(58.50)\〖mean±SD\〗，35.80±19.32(36.50)和25.42±14.65(24.00)。男性受试者(n=31)分别为67.45±29.95(61.00)，40.25±18.83(39.00)和27.19±14.30(24.00)。女性受试者(n=19)分别为51.05±28.84(47.00)，25.52±18.32(28.00)和22.52±31.13(23.00)。根据FM100HT的误差分，得出女性颜色视觉辨别能力高于男性。通过FM100HT将色觉辨别能力分为较高(6%，TES=0～20)，中等(86%，TES=20～100)和较低(8%，TES>100)，中等水平最为常见(P<0.05)。DE和NDE的红绿LES分别为24.12±14.70和32.20±14.21，DE和NDE的蓝黄LES分别为34.68±18.95和36.24±17.56。女性(n=19)DE和NDE的红绿色LES分别为21.89±15.06和31.00±22.42； 男性(n=31)则为25.48±14.55和32.93±17.31。女性(n=19)DE和NDE蓝黄色LES分别为29.63±18.62和33.42±17.38，男性(n=31)则为37.77±18.78和37.96±17.73。所有学生的TE，DE及NDE的TES和立体视觉水平均进行比较，差异均无统计学意义(P=1)。研究表明色觉辨别能力和双眼深度知觉无关。

结论：FM100HT的TES显示：正常人不同个体立体视觉水平无差异，基于色觉分离的TNO检测的深度直觉与色觉辨别能力不相关。在之前的研究中，DE色觉辨别能力优于NDE。但目前研究表明在深度知觉方面DE并非优于NDE。

METHODS:A total of 52 students, 33 males(63.46%)and 19 females(36.54%)from Baskent University Faculty of Medicine, aged 21.18±2.52y included in this study. Subject has normal visual acuity(20/20)and without congenital color vision deficiency(CCVD). They were evaluated by Ishihara Pseudoisochromatic Plate Test(IPPT). Dominant eye(DE)was determined using the Gundogan Method. The CDA was examined by Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue Test(FM100HT)test for detecting total error score(TES)and local error score(LES)for two eyes(TE)open, the right eye(RE)open and the left eye(LE)open. The error scores were divided into the three groups: for the TE, for the dominant eye(DE)and for the non-dominant eye(NDE). The presence of the binocularity and stereoscopic sensitivity(SS)were investigated by TNO test which were also divided into four groups according to the level of SS within a range of 480-15 arc/s.

RESULTS:The error scores of FM100HT without gender difference for TES, blue/yellow(b/y)LES and red/green(r/g)LES were found 61.22±30.32(58.50), 35.80±19.32(36.50)and 25.42±14.65(24.00)respectively. In male subjects(n=31)were found 67.45±29.95(61.00), 40.25±18.83(39.00)and 27.19±14.30(24.00)respectively. In female subjects(n=19)were found 51.05±28.84(47.00), 25.52±18.32(28.00)and 22.2±31.13(23.00)respectively. Females had higher CDA than males according FM100HT error scores. CDA classification according to FM100HT were found to be higher(6%, TES=0-20), medium(86%, TES=20-100), lower(8%, TES>100), the medium level was statistically more frequently observed(P<0.05). The r/g color LES for DE and NDE were 24.12±14.70 and 32.20±14.21, b/y color LES for DE and NDE were 34.68±1.95 and 36.24±17.56 respectively. In female(n=19)r/g color LES for DE and NDE were 21.89±15.06 and 31.00±22.42; in male(n=31)25.48±14.55 and 32.93±17.31. In female(n=19)b/y color LES for DE and NDE were 29.63±18.62 and 33.42±17.38; in male(n=31)37.77±18.78 and 37.96±17.73 respectively. All students' TES of TE, DE and NDE subgroups and stereopsis level of were compared, the differences were not statistically significant(P=1). According to our research CDA and binocular depth perception does not effect on each other.

CONCLUSION: In normal subjects TES of FM100HT showed that no difference in the subject with different stereopsis level and the depth perception evaluated by TNO test which is based on color dissociation and the ability to color discrimination was not correlated. Our previous study DE's CDA was found superior to the NDE's. But in the presenting study showed that DE was not superior to NDE in terms of depth perception.