方法：试验组23例23眼患儿在配镜及定量遮盖的基础上弱视眼进行脱抑制、单眼调节训练、双眼调节集合训练、双眼融像训练、双眼扫视训练、双眼运动融像训练等，对照组20例23眼患儿在配镜及定量遮盖的基础上只进行光刷、红闪、光栅、精目训练等弱视训练。

结果：立体视、AMP、AF、NRA、PRA、NPC试验组与对照组组间治疗前对比分析无统计学差异(P>0.05)； 立体视、AMP、AF、PRA、NPC试验组与对照组组间治疗后对比分析有统计学差异(P<0.05)； NRA试验组与对照组组间治疗后对比无统计学差异(P>0.05)； 立体视、AMP、AF、NRA、PRA、NPC试验组与对照组对比治疗前无统计学差异(P>0.05)； 立体视、AMP、AF、NRA、PRA、NPC试验组与对照组对比治疗后有统计学差异(P<0.05)，通过数据对比可以看出试验组数据明显优于对照组。

结论：在弱视治疗后期加入视功能训练与传统弱视治疗对比，加入视功能训练双眼立体视、AMP、AF、PRA、NPC等各项视功能数据明显优于传统弱视治疗，NRA与传统弱视治疗无差异。

METHODS:Group of 23 children on the basis of quantitative cover glasses and adjust the disinhibition, monocular amblyopia eyes, eyes set training, eyes like training, eyes scanning training, eye movement, such as training, the control group of 20 children on the basis of quantitative cover glasses and only the brush, red flashing light, such as grating, fine mesh training amblyopia training.

RESULTS:Between experimental group and the control way comparison before and after treatment in stereoscopic, AMP, AF, the NRA, PRA, the NPC has significant difference(P<0.05), the experimental group compared with control group in the group with no difference between the data before the treatment, the experimental group and control group after treatment in group and the contrast stereoscopic, AMP, AF, PRA, NPC has significant difference(P<0.05)while the NRA no difference(P>0.05), but the experimental group was better than control group from the data.

CONCLUSION:Binocular visual function training in amblyopia treatment later joined significantly improve the therapeutic efficacy of binocular visual function recovery.