目的：研究真实世界下玻璃体腔注射抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗眼底血管性疾病无应答的影响因素。

方法：回顾性分析。纳入2016-10/2022-10本院收治的眼底血管性疾病患者160例160眼，其中湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性(wARMD)64眼(40.0%)，息肉状脉络膜血管(PCV)17眼(10.6%)，糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)45眼(28.1%)、视网膜静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿(RVO-ME)26眼(16.3%)、高度近视继发脉络膜新生血管(PM-CNV)8眼(5.0%)。所有患者均进行3+PRN抗VEGF治疗。根据患者第3次抗VEGF治疗后1 mo的应答情况分为应答有效组135眼(84.4%)和无应答组25眼(15.6%)。分析影响抗VEGF治疗眼底血管性疾病治疗的因素。

结果：两组患者年龄、术前BCVA、视网膜内高反射点(HRD)、PCV、视网膜下强反射物质(SHRM)、PM-CNV比较均有差异(均P<0.05)。Logistics回归分析提示术前BCVA差，年龄大，视网膜内HRD、SHRM、PCV、PM-CNV是影响玻璃体腔注射抗VEGF治疗眼底血管性疾病无应答的因素。

结论：抗VEGF治疗眼底血管性疾病无应答与年龄、基线视力、病理类型因素相关。需要对病例进行个体化分析，探索更适合的最佳个性化治疗方案。

METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 160 patients(160 eyes)with fundus vascular diseases, including 64 eyes(40.0%)of wet age-related macular degeneration(wARMD), 17 eyes(10.6%)of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy(PCV), 45 eyes(28.1%)of diabetic macular edema(DME), 26 eyes(16.3%)of retinal vein occlusion-macular edema(RVO-ME), and 8 eyes(5.0%)of choroidal neovascularization(PM-CNV). All patients received 3+PRN anti-VEGF therapy. Factors influencing anti-VEGF treatment on the fundus vascular diseases were analyzed.

RESULTS: There were statistical significant difference in age, preoperative best corrected visual acuity(BCVA), hyper reflective dots(HRD), PCV, subretinal hyperreflective material(SHRM), and PM-CNV(all P<0.05). Logistics regression analysis noted that poor preoperative BCVA, age, intraretinal HRD, SHRM, PCV and PM-CNV were influencing factors of non-response to intravitreal injection of anti-VEGF in the treatment of fundus vascular diseases.

CONCLUSION: Non-response to anti-VEGF therapy in patients with fundus vascular diseases is associated with various factors, including age, baseline visual acuity, and disease pathology. Individualized treatment strategies should be explored to optimize outcomes for non-responding patients.