Home > Archive>Volume 15, Issue 10, 2022 >1671-1675. DOI:10.18240/ijo.2022.10.16
HTML XML Export Cite reminder
Refractive outcomes and optical quality of PRESBYOND laser-blended vision for presbyopia correction
Author:
Corresponding Author:

Xing-Tao Zhou. Eye and ENT Hospital of Fudan University, No.19 Baoqing Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai 200030, China. doctzhouxingtao@163.com

Fund Project:

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81770955); National Natural Science Foundation of China for Young Scholars (No.82000929); Project of Shanghai Science and Technology (No.20410710100); Clinical Research Plan of SHDC (No.SHDC2020CR1043B); Project of Shanghai Xuhui District Science and Technology (No.2020-015); Project of Shanghai Xuhui District Science and Technology (No.XHLHGG202104); Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Laser and Autostereoscopic 3D for Vision Care (No.20DZ2255000); Shanghai Sailing Program (No.20YF1405000).

  • Article
    • | |
  • Metrics
    • |
  • Reference [31]
    • |
  • Related
    • | | |
  • Comments
    Abstract:

    AIM: To investigate the one-year refractive outcomes and optical quality following PRESBYOND laser-blended vision (LBV). METHODS: This retrospective study included 20 patients who underwent PRESBYOND treatment between Jan 2019 and Aug 2020. The patients were asked to attend a follow-up outpatient visit one year after surgery. Distance and near visual acuity as well as subjective refraction were examined. Optical quality was assessed using wavefront-supported custom ablation. A questionnaire evaluating optical quality and satisfaction was completed at the last visit. RESULTS: The average patient age was 48.1±7.4y (range, 41 to 58y). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -7.59±2.39 D. At the one-year follow-up, two eyes (both dominant eyes) lost one line of corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), while the remaining eyes (38/40) maintained or gained lines of CDVA. The average binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity improved from 0.15±0.03 to 0.90±0.26 (decimal vision; P<0.001). The average binocular uncorrected near visual acuity increased from 0.34±0.28 to 0.97±0.07 (P<0.001). The spherical aberration was 0.04±0.06 μm in the nondominant eye and 0.09±0.09 μm in the dominant eye (P=0.02). All patients were satisfied with or accepted the outcomes of the surgery. The primary complaints were related to disturbances in night vision and relatively inferior near vision. CONCLUSION: Over the one-year observation period, PRESBYOND is a safe and effective option for presbyopia correction. The optical quality and near vision deserve further investigation.

    Reference
    1 Kamiya K, Umeda K, Kobashi H, Shimizu K, Kawamorita T, Uozato H. Effect of aging on optical quality and intraocular scattering using the double-pass instrument. Curr Eye Res 2012;37(10):884-888.
    2 Lu Q, He W, Murthy GV, He X, Congdon N, Zhang L, Li L, Yang J. Presbyopia and near-vision impairment in rural Northern China. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52(5):2300-2305.
    3 Ayaki M, Negishi K. Short tear breakup time could exacerbate the progression of presbyopia in women. Biomed Res Int 2022;2022: 8159669.
    4 Trends in prevalence of blindness and distance and near vision impairment over 30y: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health 2021;9(2):e130-e143.
    5 Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Presbyopia: effectiveness of correction strategies. Prog Retin Eye Res 2019;68:124-143.
    6 Grzybowski A, Markeviciute A, Zemaitiene R. A review of pharmacological presbyopia treatment. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2020;9(3):226-233.
    7 Arba Mosquera S, Alió JL. Presbyopic correction on the cornea. Eye Vis (Lond) 2014;1:5.
    8 Fu D, Zeng L, Zhao J, Miao HM, Yu ZQ, Zhou XT. Safety and satisfaction of myopic small-incision lenticule extraction combined with monovision. BMC Ophthalmol 2018;18(1):131.
    9 Peng MY, Hannan S, Teenan D, Schallhorn SJ, Schallhorn JM. Monovision LASIK in emmetropic presbyopic patients. Clin Ophthalmol 2018;12:1665-1671.
    10 Alarcón A, Anera RG, Villa C, Jiménez del Barco L, Gutierrez R. Visual quality after monovision correction by laser in situ keratomileusis in presbyopic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37(9):1629-1635.
    11 Elmohamady MN, Abdelghaffar W, Bayoumy ASM, Gad EA. Correction of pseudophakic presbyopia using Lasik with aspheric ablation profiles and a micro-monovision protocol. Int Ophthalmol 2021;41(1):79-86.
    12 Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. LASIK for myopic astigmatism and presbyopia using non-linear aspheric micro-monovision with the Carl zeiss meditec MEL 80 platform. J Refract Surg 2011;27(1):23-37.
    13 Reinstein DZ, Couch DG, Archer TJ. LASIK for hyperopic astigmatism and presbyopia using micro-monovision with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL80 platform. J Refract Surg 2009;25(1):37-58.
    14 Vargas-Fragoso V, Alió JL. Corneal compensation of presbyopia: PresbyLASIK: an updated review. Eye Vis (Lond) 2017;4:11.
    15 Ganesh S, Brar S, Gautam M, Sriprakash K. Visual and refractive outcomes following laser blended vision using non-linear aspheric micro-monovision. J Refract Surg 2020;36(5):300-307.
    16 Lim DH, Chung ES, Kim MJ, Chung TY. Visual quality assessment after presbyopic laser in-situ keratomileusis. Int J Ophthalmol 2018;11(3):462-469.
    17 Imbeau L, Majzoub S, Thillay A, Bonnet-Brilhault F, Pisella PJ, Batty M. Presbyopia compensation: looking for cortical predictors. Br J Ophthalmol 2017;101(2):223-226.
    18 Li MY, Li M, Chen YJ, Miao HM, Yang D, Ni K, Zhou XT. Five-year results of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser LASIK (FS-LASIK) for myopia. Acta Ophthalmol 2019;97(3):e373-e380.
    19 Falcon C, Norero Martínez M, Sancho Miralles Y. Laser blended vision for presbyopia: results after 3y. J Fr Ophtalmol 2015;38(5):431-439.
    20 Shetty R, Brar S, Sharma M, Dadachanji Z, Lalgudi VG. PresbyLASIK: a review of PresbyMAX, Supracor, and laser blended vision: principles, planning, and outcomes. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020; 68(12):2723-2731.
    21 Park SH, Che CY, Kim SI, Park CY, Lee JH, Kim YH, Jung JW, Lee JS, Lee JE. Comparison of clinical outcomes after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with low or high myopia. Int J Ophthalmol 2020;13(11):1780-1787.
    22 Cypel MC, Salomão SR, Dantas PEC, Lottenberg CL, Kasahara N, Ramos LR, Belfort R Jr. Vision status, ophthalmic assessment, and quality of life in the very old. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2017;80(3):159-164.
    23 Fu D, Zhao J, Zhou XT. Objective optical quality and visual outcomes after the PresbyMAX monocular ablation profile. Int J Ophthalmol 2020;13(7):1060-1065.
    24 Fernández J, Rodríguez-Vallejo M, Burguera N, Rocha-de-Lossada C, Piñero DP. Spherical aberration for expanding depth of focus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2021;47(12):1587-1595.
    25 Garcia-Gonzalez M, Teus MA, Hernandez-Verdejo JL. Visual outcomes of LASIK-induced monovision in myopic patients with presbyopia. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150(3):381-386.
    26 Hayashi K, Ogawa S, Manabe SI, Yoshimura K. Binocular visual function of modified pseudophakic monovision. Am J Ophthalmol 2015;159(2):232-240.
    27 Benard Y, Lopez-Gil N, Legras R. Subjective depth of field in presence of 4th-order and 6th-order Zernike spherical aberration using adaptive optics technology. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010; 36(12):2129-2138.
    28 Liao X, Haung X, Lan CJ, Tan QQ, Wen BW, Lin J, Tian J. Comprehensive evaluation of retinal image quality in comparing different aspheric to spherical intraocular lens implants. Curr Eye Res 2019;44(10):1098-1103.
    29 Eydelman M, Hilmantel G, Tarver ME, Hofmeister EM, May J, Hammel K, Hays RD, Ferris F 3rd. Symptoms and satisfaction of patients in the patient-reported outcomes with laser In situ keratomileusis (PROWL) studies. JAMA Ophthalmol 2017;135(1):13-22.
    30 Almutairi MS, Altoaimi BH, Bradley A. Impact of monovision on dynamic accommodation of early presbyopes. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2020;40(1):47-59.
    31 Katada Y, Negishi K, Watanabe K, Shigeno Y, Saiki M, Torii H, Kaido M, Tsubota K. Functional visual acuity of early presbyopia. PLoS One 2016;11(3):e0151094.
    Related
    Cited by
Get Citation

Dan Fu, Aruma Aruma, Ye Xu,/et al.Refractive outcomes and optical quality of PRESBYOND laser-blended vision for presbyopia correction. Int J Ophthalmol, 2022,15(10):1671-1675

Copy
Share
Article Metrics
  • Abstract:
  • PDF:
  • HTML:
  • Cited by:
Publication History
  • Received:November 30,2021
  • Revised:July 27,2022
  • Online: September 21,2022
You are the  Visitors
Governing Body：Department of Health, Provincial Government of Shaanxi, China
Organizer：Xi'an Medical Association of China
Address：Room 11707-08, Building 2, Unit 1, Wanda Plaza, No.8 Yanta North Road, Xi'an 710054, Shaanxi Province, China
Fax：(8629)82245172 Phone：(+8629)82245172/82210956
Email：ijopress@163.com
International Journal of Ophthalmology ® 2025 All Rights Reserved   The terms of CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 are applicable to all open access content.